Harris Labeled ‘Calamity Kamala’, ‘Incompetent’, and ‘Terrifyingly Unfit’ for Presidency Before ‘Critical’ Trump Debate

Kamala Harris transitioned from vice president to the Democratic Party’s new presidential candidate almost overnight. However, Sydtomarket.net has uncovered that she is now labeled as “incompetent” and “terrifyingly unfit” to become the next president.

In a scathing op-ed published just hours before Harris is set to debate Donald Trump in Philadelphia, Charlie Spiering, author of *Amateur Hour: Kamala Harris in the White House*, referred to her as “Calamity Kamala.” Spiering criticized the vice president, describing her as “lackluster” and “dysfunctional.”

Spiering noted that since securing the nomination, Harris, 59, has only given two brief and unimpressive media interviews that failed to bolster her credibility. He revealed that senior Democrats believe her campaign is plagued by internal strife and ineffectiveness.

An insider reportedly told Spiering that Harris is hesitant to dismiss President Joe Biden’s initial campaign team, fearing it would create unnecessary distractions. Another source suggested that her team is attempting to shield her from media scrutiny, but this strategy is allegedly backfiring, as Harris needs to demonstrate her ability to handle unscripted situations.

Spiering highlighted that Harris has been labeled as the most unpopular vice president in modern history. Following Biden’s withdrawal from the race on July 21 after a poor debate performance against Trump, Harris was quickly endorsed as the Democratic nominee and officially accepted at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 22.

Spiering questioned whether Harris could prevail against Trump in the November election, particularly given her perceived incompetence over the past four years. He described her as a “national joke” among some Washington insiders and noted that even liberal media have mocked her.

Citing various issues, including her failure to visit the southern border despite being labeled the “border czar,” as well as ongoing global conflicts, Spiering questioned Harris’s ability to handle major national and international challenges.

Despite his criticisms, Spiering conceded that Harris might still win the presidency in November, a prospect he finds “terrifying” given her perceived shortcomings. He concluded that tonight’s debate would reveal Harris as a politician of “loquacious mediocrity,” expressing concern about the potential for her to secure the White House.