Elle Macpherson Hit With Horrific Warning by TV Host Over Her Claims Holistic ‘Miracle Medicine’ Stopped Her Cancer: ‘Someone is Going to Die!’

**Elle Macpherson Faces Intense Backlash Over Claims That Holistic Treatment Cured Her Breast Cancer**

In a storm of controversy, Elle Macpherson has ignited widespread outrage for maintaining that unconventional, hippie-style treatments were responsible for her victory over breast cancer. The supermodel’s assertions have drawn sharp criticism from medical professionals, cancer survivors, and fellow broadcasters alike.

Speaking out against Macpherson’s views is Kerri-Anne Kennerley, a prominent Australian television host and breast cancer survivor. Kennerley, who has openly discussed her own battle with the disease since her diagnosis in 2012, voiced her alarm over Macpherson’s promotion of alternative therapies as a lifeline for cancer patients. She cautioned that such endorsements could lead others to make dangerous choices that seriously jeopardize their lives.

In a recent episode of *60 Minutes Australia*, Macpherson reiterated her belief in holistic remedies, claiming they played a pivotal role in her recovery while rejecting the advice of the 32 doctors who recommended conventional treatment options. Kennerley responded with frustration, remarking, “While Elle has every right to make personal choices, it’s profoundly concerning that she’s presenting her experiences as a viable option for others.” She continued, “This could enable someone out there to choose a path that might ultimately cost them their life.”

Kennerley criticized *60 Minutes* for airing a segment that lacked adequate medical scrutiny, arguing that it was irresponsible not to include an oncologist to provide a balanced perspective. She emphasized the necessity of expert opinions in discussions about serious medical conditions, warning that the absence of such viewpoints could mislead vulnerable audiences.

Macpherson’s choice to opt for alternative treatments, including an intuitive, heart-centered approach following a lumpectomy rather than the recommended mastectomy, raises complex questions about the intersection of personal beliefs and medical advice. The 60-year-old model reflected on her diagnosis, noting, “It was a profound shock, and like many women, I never thought I’d be affected by something so serious.”

Despite her journey through cancer treatment spanning several years, with Macpherson currently in remission, her emphasis on alternative remedies continues to raise alarm. She expressed that her heartfelt reasoning led her to reject conventional surgeries, labeling such options as illogical within her belief framework.

The discourse surrounding Macpherson’s treatment choices illustrates a growing divide between traditional medicine advocates and proponents of holistic healing. Kennerley’s firm stance highlights the potential dangers of misinformation, especially when delivered by high-profile figures whose influence can extend to vulnerable populations seeking hope amidst despair.

As the debate simmers, the implications of Macpherson’s messaging on public health continue to unfold, leaving both advocates and critics to grapple with the realities of cancer treatment in a landscape rife with conflicting views.