Gazans Share Views on Trump, Harris, and the Election

Election Day 2024: Gazans Share Their Views on Trump and Harris

As the election draws nearer, the sentiments of Palestinians, particularly those in Gaza, regarding the U.S. presidency have come to the forefront. With the looming contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, Gazans have voiced their perspectives, revealing a wide array of opinions on the candidates’ potential impact.

Over the years, I have navigated journalism primarily focused on cultural narratives rather than political landscapes. However, the pivotal moment came during the 2016 U.S. presidential election when I was tasked with gauging Gazans’ opinions on American candidates. To my surprise, the interest was palpable. Fast forward to the current election, where the general consensus in Gaza is that the U.S. plays a crucial role in the ongoing conflict with Israel, and many locals are disillusioned with current President Joe Biden.

Recently, I engaged five residents of Gaza about the upcoming election. Four of these individuals have been displaced from northern Gaza to Khan Yunis, and one, Rami Aman, is currently in Egypt. Their insights, shared below, were translated and refined for clarity.

Sherine, a 35-year-old woman, expressed a yearning for an American leader with compassion. She criticized Biden, asserting that he has only fueled the violence and failed to promote peace. She recalled how Trump had previously contributed to halting the 2021 conflict, while she saw no such efforts from the current administration. “We desire an American president who understands the value of life in Gaza and rejects the notion that our suffering is justified by Israel’s right to defend itself,” she stated.

Fifty-five-year-old Salem shared his skepticism about any of the candidates. “Trump’s past remarks have often bordered on hate, while Harris, as part of Biden’s administration, carries the baggage of his policies that have devastated our homes. We need a leader who prioritizes humanity and democracy over conflict,” he lamented. Salem emphasized the dire need for someone to actively pursue peace and rebuild what has been lost.

Belal, 40, echoed a hopeful sentiment towards Trump, noting his perceived aversion to war. “Despite some confusing comments, I believe he has the potential to halt the violence. We need someone who will address the humanitarian crisis and advocate for our rights,” he articulated. He highlighted the urgent need for justice and support from the international community, particularly the United States.

Another voice, Reham Owda, also focused on the political dynamics between Harris and Netanyahu, suggesting that Harris may be unable to influence the ongoing conflict favorably. “Trump has a personal rapport with Netanyahu, which could facilitate a quicker resolution to end the violence,” she argued, pointing out the economic implications of the war for the U.S.

Lastly, Rami Aman reflected on the broader implications of U.S. elections for Gaza. “The reality is that each administration has perpetuated this cycle of violence with little regard for our humanity. Regardless of who wins, the policy implications will undoubtedly be influential in how the conflict evolves,” he stated. Rami emphasized the loss of trust in American intentions and the need for genuine humanitarian support from the West.

The interviewees collectively articulated a deep-seated frustration with the current political landscape and a desire for a leader who will prioritize peace and humanitarian concerns over military support for Israel. As the U.S. inches closer to another pivotal election, the voices of ordinary Gazans underscore the urgent need for change in American foreign policy concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.